I don't usually take the time to reply to negative comments that are left on this blog — why encourage people who are spoiling for a fight? I'm not bothered by their criticism, for the most part (and if it's justified I do try to take it to heart, however unpleasant it may be to do so!). But most of the time replying to negative comments falls under the heading "Never wrestle with a pig. You get dirty and only the pig enjoys it."
However, there have been a few comments on a recent post which I feel I need to respond to, if only for clarification. A commenter, mainly anonymous, but also signing one comment "7/10 split", suggested that I am a "professional what? writer/ advertisers? whose goal is to sell things", and also a "shill."
For the record: I am not a "professional advertiser". I am a writer, but of a very particular kind.
The same commenter (who may be this blogger) also suggested that I don't sew the dresses that I post here. If you would like to see pictures of ME in the dresses I have sewn (and I admit, I don't often post pictures of myself here because, all things considered, I had a better time in labor — and I didn't have an epidural! — than I do having my picture taken) you can see them in five out of the first six pictures here.
(The dresses shown in that link include a Duro, the pink jellybean dress, the blogiversary dress, the stunt Valentine's Dress, and the yellow-bird dress.)
Whether you enjoy my posts or not, I would like to state unequivocally that I do NOT accept money to post about any particular dress, fabric, pattern, pair of shoes, etc. There is NO payola or kickback scheme in effect on this blog.
For book reviews, I am, as is common practice in publishing, often provided with free copies of the book in question, to review or to give away.
The advertisers on the right-hand side are just that: advertisers. They have no influence on content, and I do *not* ask them for free stuff.
I accept pictorial ads ONLY from people who sell patterns, fabric, or vintage clothes, or are otherwise related to sewing. I must approve the ad before it will run. My ad rates are very low; $25/month (with a minimum three-month commitment, because I'm lazy and don't want to be bothered putting up and taking down ads all the time). I also participate in Google's AdSense program, which are the boxed text ads you see on the page, and in the Amazon Associates program, which gives me a commission on books purchased by Amazon customers who clicked on links to books from this blog. (To give you an idea of the revenue from those two sources; my last "payment" from Amazon was a $35 gift certificate which I used … to buy more sewing books. Google pays every two months or so; I think my last check from them was in the $125 range.)
I have set up "Dress a Day Inc" as a LLC company, so that, if I say something libelous and am sued, the company will be the target of any lawsuit (and not my family). This means I file taxes on all the income from this blog — if there is any, after paying hosting fees to my internet service provider.
As for the comments about the sweater in question, I am doing a little research on the subject; the commenter suggested that the sweater probably cost less than $1 to make, and that all the labor involved was sweatshop labor in Asia. I don't think that's right, given that the cost of a pound of even low-grade cotton is about .71 — that's a pound of unspun cotton. From what I can tell, the spinning of one pound of raw cotton fiber produces 840 yards of yarn. That seems to be on the low end of the number of yards you'd need for a sweater — any knitters want to jump in here? — and the sweater I posted about was 14 gauge, which is a fairly fine knit). So, at least .71 in raw materials, plus the spinning cost, plus the fashioning cost, plus the cost of the buttons — I think it would be hard to get the raw goods cost of this garment under $1. Even leaving aside that the garment is made in China (I called and asked) — there's the cost of the coming up with the design, a job almost certainly done by an American at American wages. (J.Crew employs about 7600 people.) The same commenter said that the sweater I linked to could be found in discount stores for under $20; if, in fact, that is the case — why haven't I found it there? It's not like I haven't been looking! Do you factor the salary of the designer into the cost of the sweater? If not, why not? Do you factor in the jobs of the catalog writers (Americans), shop employees (American and for the stores in Japan, Japanese)? The distribution center employees (in Virginia and North Carolina)? The UPS guy who will bring it to me? (Hi Luis!) The short answer, it seems to me, is that a narrow focus on manufacturing jobs is not helpful; if the company can't manufacture goods at a reasonable price, then all those other jobs I mentioned above — they go away, too. Despite conjecture about how much of the price of the sweater is pure profit, large retail chains have VERY small profit margins — one source puts it at 2%. Another source (from 1998!) puts the apparel profit margin at 5.4% … and given the rising costs of commodities since 1998, I can't imagine that margin has gone up.
I apologize for such a long and tedious post, without even any pretty pictures to enliven it; I promise not to make a habit of this kind of thing. However, I do treasure the trust you place in me by visiting this blog, leaving comments, and contributing to a little oasis of dress-loving camaraderie online, and I didn't want to give credence to accusations of shilling, payola, and "blogging under false pretenses" by letting them go by in silence.
(Comments of the kind "all her taste is in her mouth," "this is soooooo ugly lol", and "i cant believe u wear this!" will still be ignored. De gustibus, etc.)
If you ever have any questions about me or this blog, well, my email address is on the right-hand side, towards the bottom. I do try to answer all the email I receive.
A Dress A Day 
Perhaps 7/10 splits mum didnt tell them that if you cant think of anything nice to say not to say anything at all.Erin I enjoy your sartorial style and your writing style. Through this blog I have re-discovered my sewing life and now am a member of a lovely sewing forum. Thank you.
LikeLike
I’m a faithful reader here, but don’t often (ever) comment. HOWEVER… I had to say good job. This was a very well-written post, honest, and to-the-point. 🙂 If they don’t like your blog, they don’t have to keep coming back!! 😀
LikeLike
Dear Erin,Keep up your blog. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE it!I thank the day I found this blog by googling “wrap dress”.Dear Anonymous or 7/10, Please do consider NOT reading this blog as it is making you a bit tense, no?Sincerely, Sara– A “Real” person who wishes sometimes that she could be Erin
LikeLike
we can employ the amish practice of Shunning. If we act like they don’t exist they will get bored and go away.
LikeLike
I would also like to join the “We Love Erin” Fan Club. I love that this blog is the first thing I read online in the morning and often it keeps me smiling ( or cying from the post about your Dad) all day. I called my Dad after reading the post aobut your Dad!The fact that you posted a well thought out response to 7/10 only reaffirms my high opinion of you! Can’t wait to read more!
LikeLike
Erin, and commenters, please don’t feed the trolls. Is everyone here too young to remember the Star Trek episode in which we learned that evil thrives when you feed it fear and attention? http://www.ericweisstein.com/fun/startrek/WolfInTheFold.htmlYour troll has now harvested enough to feed a family of four (trolls) for two weeks!
LikeLike
I love your blog. I went to high school in the early 60s (grad in65) and love seeing your dresses. Reminds me so much of what we wore to school–no jeans allowed in my day! I’ll keep checking your site daily and enjoy the dresses you make from all those wonderful patterns you find. I’ve even bought some patterns even tho I don’t have anywhere right now to wear one (I’m retired). Maybe a wedding or something will come up and I’ll make one. I’ve been sewing since I was 11 and would not have had school clothes if I hadn’t sewen them (we were very poor). Wish now I’d have kept all my patterns–even tho they wouldn’t fit me now. Keep up this wonderful blog! Ignore the pissy losers!Linda, Stanwood WA
LikeLike
Trolls thrive on attention. Any attention.Erin usually gets nice comments. It’s easy for a nasty troll to stand out here.I actually feel sorry for 7/10 Split. What a joyless, lonely life someone like that must lead.
LikeLike
As a person who actually knows you in real life, the thought that you’re not an actual person makes me laff and laff! (Who could come up with a character as interesting as you?) And you’re such a shill, with your sewing machine-buying guides and links to vintage dresses on eBay! Yeah, not so much. xoJesse
LikeLike
Erin, I’m really saddened that you have been backed into a corner of such a messy pig-pen. There’s a rule of thumb in mental health services to detect when somebody needs help or intervention; basically, if they’re upsetting enough people as a matter of routine in their daily doings, they need help. I sincerely hope that anonymous:7/10 takes this as a wake-up call and finds a sympathetic counsellor and/or medicating doctor. It’s just not right to be foisting this behaviour on good, warm-hearted people like Erin and generally jangling the nerves of this “oasis of dress-loving camaraderie” (lovely description, Erin).You’re a fantastic blogger, Erin, and my admiration for you is enormous. You can be consistently relied upon to brighten the day (early afternoon, in my case) with your pithy observations and lightness of touch. Keep it up. I look forward to the return of pretty pictures of whatever the heck you choose to include. I’m never, ever disappointed.Meanwhile, a bit of tough love is in order for the persistent trolling. The oxygen of attention should perhaps be withheld from here on – can we all promise not to snap up the bait anymore?
LikeLike
Good gosh, some people really get wound up like a cheap watch sometimes, huh?I am a lurker who reads your blog regularly. Kay
LikeLike
Good gosh, some people really get wound up like a cheap watch sometimes, huh?I am a lurker who reads your blog regularly. Kay
LikeLike
Hi Erin! I have been reading this blog for about a year, but this is the first time I have posted a comment. Reading your blog is honestly the best part of my day. I get it in my RSS feeds at work and always start my day by reading your blog, because it makes me happy!Don’t spend another minute on this negative person. It’s one thing to care about the environment or human rights, but it’s another to attack someone for sport. And really, what is she accomplishing? She is not getting her message through to anyone by being to abrasive. I love your blog, I love the patterns you post and the dresses you make. You are a huge inspiration to be as a beginner sewer. Keep doing what ya do and know that you obviously have a great group of readers who always got your back!!
LikeLike
You know, there is an old addage that says… “If you can’t say something nice don’t say anything at all!” Funny that 7/10 split gets their feathers ruffled so easily… if you weren’t doing something right/interesting/or /of use to usWhy Does this person keep coming back? It is interesting to me (although I am sorry that your the one that has to endure all the garbage!) that if supposedly you are doing something that is sooo wrong, why do you have so many readers, including 7/10? Keep up the good work, you know, even if you were not sewing dresses etc… if you were just showing patterns and not sewing… your blog would still be worth reading. I’m thinking enough said! Jean C.
LikeLike
Funny, but upon hearing the little “You’re a shill!” thing I flashed immediately on this … which neatly sums up Erin’s take on actual shills. And the “You’re not a real person” accusation is especially interesting; I’ve sometimes been amazed about how open Erin is about who she is, what she does, where she is. I guess one interesting insight I’ve gained, meditating for five minutes on this, is that the most faithful of us D-a-D readers are fairly literate, word-loving types, people who would read long and deeply before coming to conclusions about who a blogger ‘truly’ is. For me, the “Secret Lives” series really illuminate something about the heart and soul of this whole blog and its beloved writer {wistful sigh}. Who knows, even ‘anonymous’ might be touched if she/he slowed down and actually, y’know, READ.
LikeLike
I also have never commented before and ALWAYS read your post in the morning with my coffee. I find it very enriching and inspiring. I am almost ready to attempt sewing again for myself after many, many years. Thanks for what you do. Eileen
LikeLike
I like expensive Liberty fabric, this is true. I would spend money on it if I wanted some, also true.But my appreciation of Liberty is not the reason I loved the “$45.00 Fabric Post” below.Nope, that post was a much needed insight into the nature of taking risks and learning from mistakes. I’ve already incorporated “cut the d*mn fabric” into my Stock Of Useful Phrases. I am sure I will continue to use it in the future.Erin, if you are in fact some kind of Internet Salesbot, I am paying more attention to the things you can’t buy rather than the things you’re trying to sell.You’re a really lousy shill.
LikeLike
Personality number 312 checking in to say I love Me, em, I Love Erin, uh I love cardigans? oh dear, I can’t seem to keep track of my identity.The problem with you being an actual real person, is that occasionally you miss a day and there is no Dress for that day and I go into withdrawal – sadly clicking refresh periodically, just in case you are in a different time zone and the post will appear later. And *that* is the only complaint I can make about things here.Vote Erin for Supreme Ruler of the Universe. 😀
LikeLike
Oh, good grief. Seriously, you’re trying to force us to buy stuff? I’m easy, let me tell you, and I’ve never once felt like I was being compelled to buy something. That is utterly ridiculous. I love this blog and I will continue to reading for a long, long time to come.BTW, 7/10: price is relative. Three years ago I would have been appalled at the idea of spending $65 for a sweater. Today, I would consider it depending on the company. You see, quality matters. I’ve spent $60 for a pair of shoes that have lasted me three times as long as the $5 pair of shoes I used to buy from WalMart, and they are still in good condition. That company (Can I name them or will I just be trying to force anyone who reads this comment to go buy from them? Oh, who cares what you think: SKETCHERS) produces quality shoes that are more expensive than most, not as expensive as some, but the quality kicks butt and makes that $60 worth it and then some.Oh, yeah: you found ONE sweater under $20 on sale. That doesn’t prove your point nearly as successfully as you’d like to think it does.
LikeLike
I didn’t know you were a lexographer. How cool.
LikeLike
Ooh! I love the pig quote, too. That’s a good one I’ll have to remember. Also, it makes me horribly sad that a posting about a sweater should stir up so much controversy. I feel a little sick upon reading about this. So sorry you should have to endure the crazies. I’m glad, though, that it doesn’t deter you from continuing to share dress love with us. It’s probably obvious, by now, that those of us who get a spark of joy from reading your blog FAR outnumber those who get a stray hair up their hinders.
LikeLike
Erin, I also love DRESS A DAY – and if I see something that is “not my thing” – like a post on cotton cardigans – guess what? I don’t read it!Remember before blogs when we were all on lists and people loved to “flame”. This is the same. And for the same person to come back and continue the arguement – well it ain’t worth your time to keep it up.Relax. I haven’t thought you were selling me anything. If anything you indicate when a dress is something you made, or is not. Let ’em eat pins!
LikeLike
Whatever…Love the blog; I hope you can get back to your primary subject matter soon. Mwah!!!
LikeLike
Well, if I had to be one person (or join a single Person in blog form) I think I would be Erin. Sorry it’s not so, 7/10, but what a nice idea!
LikeLike
As a long time reader I’d say that Erin is clearly a real live person, with thoughts and opinions of her very own; where as 7/10 Split sounds like exactly the sort of name that one would give an automated robot snarker.(Did I use that semi-colon correctly? I’m terrible at punctuation.)
LikeLike
Let ’em eat pins! Sally, I love that! Boy, will I overuse that phrase…
LikeLike
Erin,I love your blog. It cheers me. It makes me laugh. It’s well written and interesting and REAL. I hope you never quit. And I love the J Crew sweater!-Jessica
LikeLike
I just wish the damn thing came in my size. Being a big gal I pay way more then I should at times if I find exactly what I am looking for (that would be a cotton and spandex wrap dress WITH A COLLAR and short sleeves…pockets would be nice in a size 30 that I do not have to hem).People always say go to the TS or discount places and you can find what you want, no problem.Wrong.(well I guess you can if you are the right size and don’t have strange body issues) I count on my hand the number of times I have found something that fits and I will actually wear at a TS.$65 is not too much for an item that one will wear again and again, plus no driving all over town to find it.
LikeLike
So as I understand it, this all started because some unhappy person “saw this on a television program”? She/he states this as if television only showed the truth or was a credible source of information. Not saying that the economy is not in a shitty place, but even news stations and newspapers are biased in what information they decide to report. Also what I’m getting from this is that he/she is condeming overseas production but is not willing to pay more than $15 on a sweater. Minimum wage in California is $8, say a sweater takes two hours to take. Cheap clothing is so because it is made outside the US. Bring production here and all sweaters will be in the $65 range. I’d be willing to pay that much for a mediocre product made here if it means helping the economy out .
LikeLike
Erin, I love your blog! And the dresses, cardies, shoes, the whole she-bang on Dress A Day. 7/11 is a very bitter and unhappy person. Try not to rise to the bait and she will just find someone else to be nasty to. I bet she spends her time writing nasty comments to many blogs. I hope she gets some therapy. It sounds like she could really use it. From Karen S.
LikeLike
no matter what happens in life someone will think you suck and you will think someone else sucks.Its The Nature of Life.Ignore it , Reaction is just a way of feeding the falme.I like you site , It gets Fed to me every morning among many various blogs that i wait for hitting the refresh button in eager anticipiation. Do what you do for you and your happiness and ignore those who make you unhappy.
LikeLike
7/10 split will never see the broader view it is impossible to get through to this type of person. And for the record the Chadwick’s sweater is imported.Erin your blog is wonderful, I am one that reads daily also. It always brightens my day and I think of it as dessert for work. Can’t wait until I have the time to read it each day.
LikeLike
Your blog is so wonderful, Erin. I know trolls are inevitable, but I do hope the happy and delighted feedback outweighs the negative by about a hundred times. You deserve that.
LikeLike
I thought it was a very thoughtful post (about the short-sleeved cardigans) because wearing something over a summer dress when in the frigid A/C of most offices is necessary to one’s comfort and health. Since I work from home I don’t have to think about it much. I have a list of “sewing blogs” that I read regularly and you’re at the top! Thank you for your contribution to making the internet a more gracious place to be.
LikeLike
Erin-I have been reading your blog almost since its inception. I don’t comment often, but I feel moved to do so now. I think you are a clever, interesting writer who happens to have fashion tastes that resemble my own. You are responsible for many of my interesting forays into the world of cyberspace fashion. I have bookmarked the Costume Institute site, Countless museum collections and purchased several vintage patterns that my dear friend sews up for me. I have a very busy life and do not have time to spent sewing or shopping for vintage clothing. (As I love to do.) But due to your site, I have a small respite in my day to check out vintage, read interesting commentary and remove myself from my daily grind.You rock-Regards-Kate
LikeLike
1. I have had things blogged about here that I never paid a cent for.2. I pay $25 monthly for the side ad. Thank my lucky stars I got in early and nearly 1/2 my traffic comes from this blog.3. I look forward to having the opportunity to meet what I HOPE is a real live Erin next month when she’s in my area!4. I find it sad, Erin, that you feel the need to give more attention to the Attention Seeking and felt ANY need to explain yourself to ANYone. Your daily readers know & love you :)XOX
LikeLike
Tell “the party pooper” to go to “Sniff it”.You write about dresses and your sewing! After 15 years without putting on a dress or sewing a stitch I’m looking at the “Walkaway Dress”, thanks to your blog.You are a miracle worker.Sweat shops are an issue in the world. But we would be truly ungrateful if we didn’t at least love and appreciate the things that are made.
LikeLike
De-lurking here to say bless your heart! You sure handled that mess with aplomb! Your blog is lovely, interesting, relevant to sewing, and clearly real! Cheers to you!
LikeLike
It’s like you said, “if you wrestle with a pig…”I’ve never once doubted Erin’s genuine opinions, her knowledge, her intelligence, or her motives. I make and sell handcrafted items including clothing, and have encountered many, many “anonymous” people who refuse to pay for quality. $65 is a lot of maney for me to spend on a sweater, but I don’t doubt that it is worth the quality of the piece.
LikeLike
I just wanted to add that I love your blog, your voice, and can’t even imagine on what grounds anyone could criticize A Dress A Day. They must be jealous, extremely petty, and very, very small. Chin up, lovely!
LikeLike
More power to you if you can use the google ads to help shave a few dollars off of hosting. The ads don’t bother me, the reviews are interesting. Don’t change a thing just because of someone’s ridiculousness. and BTW I’ll join the Erin fan club, too. I love this blog. Your words and pictures inspire me. Don’t let anyone take the shiny away from your star.
LikeLike
I for one (though I may not be a fan of short sleeved cardigans, but mostly because I’ve never actually tried one) love the blog and the spirit behind it. Erin, you rock!
LikeLike
I am one of those people who will spend a large chunk of money when I come across something fits a gap well. For example….I spend a lot of money on shoes that fit well, mix with my wardrobe, and I know will last me. If I know that I will have spent an equal amount of money on cheap Payless shoes by the time my expensive ones finally give out, I know I’ve made a good purchase. But when looking for shoes I also know that I need a stable heel (no stiletto for me), something with an oddly cut arch to fit my own odd arches, and because I also have an odd width, making a purchase without taking those into consideration could actually cause me pain. So when I find these, I buy them immediately because they fit a large number of criteria. And I’ll be honest, those shoes are some of the cheapest I own because I’ve been known to have some made for me. Does that make me a bad person? Am I not a real person because I choose to blog about it on my (wait for it) fashion-related blog?If I were a shortwaisted woman who hated pastels and yearned for a jewel-tone short sleeve cardi, I’d be doing backflips to find my niche. I know I was when I found my pair of heels. I’m not going to apologize for spending the amount of money I do on what I choose to spend it on. And while a few people here might balk at the $65 price tag, I’d be willing to bet that an even larger number would happily spend it….knowing that they finally have that particular item that they knew had to be out there somewhere. And if I knew I had an audience that had the same type of attitude as I do about finding clothing items to fit all types of bodies (not just the cookie cutter ones), I’d be blogging about it all. Purely because I’m a nice person like that. And, obviously, so is Erin.
LikeLike
I can only wonder who all of these remarks are actually coming from. After all, if you Google the word sewing, or fashion, or patterns, you will pull up several sites/blogs and all of them cross link to one another. If you bother to check them out, you will find that the same people are featured on several of them. And, you will also note that many of the pictures that they display are clearly photo-shopped. You will also note, if you really care to, that some of the people that are dressed as women, actually appear to be men in drag. And as I said in one of my previous posts, the ones that no one here seems to be able to comment on accurately, if you go against their little agenda, which clearly is the sale of fabric, patterns, magazines, sewing machines, and other items related to sewing, you will meet with extreme hostility, obfuscation, and ultimately banning. Can anyone really imagine that an average, unbiased reader could possibly work themselves up into the ‘circle the wagons, there’s gonna be a lynchin’ frenzy demonstrated here? If anything completely proves all of points I made yesterday about the reality of these sites it is this page of craziness here. The group of people whose livlihood is being threatened by my comments is all present and accounted for. If you are just an average reader, and you review every comment that has been made for the past two days, ask yourself whose comments are more reasonable, believable, knowledgable, intelligent, and on topic. Also ask yourself, why would all of these people be so crazily emotional about this subject if my observations were not deeply threatening to them. The reason they are acting this way is because they know they are busted, and their jobs are at stake. I don’t know if you are fooling anyone else, but you sure aren’t fooling me.
LikeLike
Can we please get back to some vintage dress patterns pretty please? I’m talking about dresses with interesting pockets, with flattering bodice detail, wild or outrageous collars, flirty or sexy skirts…
LikeLike
I’m with Susan–why are so many of us responding to trolls (I’m guilty, too!)? There’s no reasoning with a troll. Erin, your comment moderation policy that you linked to is excellent, and even if a troll pops up under another name, you simply don’t have to approve that comment. Just set your blog so that comments don’t appear until you moderate them, and reject anything crazy like “you don’t exist” or “you’re all the same person.” Trolls thrive on attention.
LikeLike
7/10 Split, quit while you’re ahead. You’re just providing more evidence that you’re a simpleton, and a stubborn one at that. The content of your last post was ridiculous.And I AM an “average reader”.
LikeLike
It was neat seeing pictures of you wearing the dresses you’ve posted about, like the Valentine’s stunt dress, or the bird-print waitress dress. It really shows off your skill at choosing prints and styles, and getting the dresses to fit and flatter. You look stylish and great in all of them!
LikeLike
Oh man. This 7/10 split person has seriously called us all out!I mean — my whole vintage reselling existence is now threatened and I fear my job will simply disappear now that 7/10 has exposed it! What ever will we do? BWAH HAHAhAhahaha! You’re certainly awfully self-important there, 7/10.You have entirely too much angst and bitterness.LOTS of people can afford a $65 sweater – sorry if that bothers you, but it’s true. Whether or not it’s the same sweater that one might or might not find in a different price point really has nothing to do with it. Why do you worry so much about what other people are doing with their OWN money?If you are so concerned about the state of the world — WHY ARE YOU SO NEGATIVE? Do you think that’s endearing anyone to your cause? You know the saying about more bees with honey than vinegar, right?But see – -I don’t think you HAVE any cause other than being a troll. You simply want to piss people off, not enlighten them. People who want to enlighten others know to take a much different approach.No one cares that you disagree — it’s the manner in which you state your thoughts. It’s the RUDENESS in your words and tone that no one likes. I’ve submitted many images & links to Erin over the years – I’ve spoken to her a number of times via email. Usually I send her links to or images of a vintage dress (never my OWN items) that I think she would like or that I think deserves a comment based on past observations – dresses with unusual pockets or letter/word prints. Anyone who’s been here a long time KNOWS she’s got a soft spot for those — where’s the profit in that? Do you really think there’s a profit to be made in promoting a stranger’s $10-40 vintage dress?She’s posted several of the links/pictures I’ve sent her over time.For free. Imagine that.Just a large group of people who share similar interests in sewing, vintage dresses (Now THERE’S a multi-million dollar corporate entity! HAHAHAHAHA!), and random prettiness of all sorts.Odd, isn’t it? How so many people can peacefully get along and share thoughts and ideas and just… look at pretty things?What? Oh — yes I see that’s a foreign concept to a troll.But — trolls car rarely see that they’re sitting under a bridge. So I don’t imagine they’ll listen to or believe anything anyone says. They just want to wave their arms around, stomp up and down, and maybe eat a few small passing children.Trolls, you see, aren’t happy unless they’re making other people miserable.I actually find 7/10’s mad stomping kinda cute in an errant, misguided way. My daughter used to do that when she was 4 years old and had to clean her room.
LikeLike
Hi Erin,Its good that you answered all this, and so adroitly. On the other hand, its unfortunate that you needed to.Shaun
LikeLike